Ask what Korea is talking about.

Eight in 10 South Korean judges have experienced court cases in which false or nonexistent legal precedents generated by artificial intelligence were cited, according to a survey by the Supreme Court released Monday. The survey, conducted by the Supreme Court Administration last month among 360 judges across all levels, found that approximately 80% of civil, family, and administrative judges reported instances where they applied incorrect precedents or cited non-existent ones created by AI. One judge noted that a lawyer cited a fake case number generated by AI as a reference for a Supreme Court precedent, highlighting the seriousness of the issue.